About The Blog

By
This blog is an effort to de-mystify the art history research process. I do a lot of it (for fun!) and I also write frequently. It seemed like a natural choice to combine the two. 
 
Many times I've found myself wondering "how did they figure that out?" while reading about rediscovered artworks. I've also been known to enjoy certain documentary television presentations of art research. So, in the spirit of that concept, this is a place to write up and post my own research for paintings that have not, for whatever reason, been fully figured out. 
 
It's intended to be entertaining. I may or may not be succeeding at that. Let me know. 

Questions that might be asked frequently, in theory:
 
Q: Are there any specific artists you specialize in?
A: Yes, the Massachusetts folk artist and abolitionist Deacon Robert Peckham is one of my specialties (hence so many articles on him), and I'm working on a Peckham catalog. I have a decently broad knowledge of most of his contemporaries and write articles on them from time to time, so you'll see a good range of folk art portraitists on here. I also like to go outside my comfort zone from time to time, hence the inclusion of European art as well.

Q: How often does it take to research a piece? 
A: Anywhere from days to weeks. I have pieces in my drafts from months ago that I still haven't figured out and will require much more work. Other times I'll spot a piece and have it figured out very quickly if it's an artist I know by heart. I try not to dwell on pieces that clearly can't be solved, but on the other hand, there's quite a few where I just can't bring myself to give up.
In one particularly memorable instance, a group of portraits lived in a folder labeled "That One Artist" for a long time, until that artist's work finally came up at auction (signed!) and I was able to put a name to the face. More research forthcoming.
 
Q: Where do you find pieces to look at? 
A: With American folk art, for my initial searches, I use a combination of publicly available image aggregators (like Google and Pinterest) and sales databases (like Invaluable, MutualArt, Artnet, ArchivedAuctions, etc). 
Be careful with the databases, however, as many pieces are sold with incorrect or questionable attributions; for instance, at the time of this writing, Peckham's most recent Invaluable sales are all not by Peckham. 
For that reason, in pursuit of correctly attributed paintings, it's vitally important to consult specific websites for museums and historical societies in the relevant state or area. These are often not indexed by image search algorithms, which requires a thorough manual search. I recommend the Smithsonian SIRIS Art Inventories for a comprehensive (though sometimes outdated) list of an artist's works, and the Frick's Digital Collections to unearth records of paintings from the 70s and 80s that may have slipped through the cracks.
For European art, I like to browse the Unknown Artist tag on ArtUK, though my very first discovery came from a happenstance find on a stock photo website. (If only we had an equivalent like ArtUS!)
 
Q: Do you have any affiliation with an institution?
A: Not at the moment, but I've had the good fortune of corresponding with a wide number of experts in various areas and disciplines.
 
Q: Are you actually qualified?
A: I'd like to think so, although you can make up your own mind. Though much of my folk art study is self-guided (as those artists were themselves), I got my undergraduate degree from Princeton University in Art & Archaeology in 2018. I've also been a visual artist in various disciplines (specializing in characters and portraiture) for about fifteen years now. It's partly my art historical studies, and partly my work as a character artist, that seems to give me some kind of affinity for recognizing portraiture.
 
Q: Do you take research requests?
A: Yes, I would, if/when I receive any.
 
Q: Are you on social media?
A: No, which is probably why I have time to do this. Email me if you want to get in touch.

Popular posts from this blog

Old Finds: A Nantucket Legacy (James S. Hathaway)

By
Image
Folk art is fraught with loss. One of the best-known artists, Joseph Whiting Stock, recorded 900 paintings in his lifetime, but only 100 still survive . It is quite possible that this statistic applies to every folk artist we know, prompting the grim realization that only a slim fraction of these major and minor masterpieces are still intact at all. The same may be true for folk artists themselves. For every single one we have identified, there might be another whose name we’ll never know. And even among the artists who have survived — the lucky ones by name, the unlucky ones as a “limner” — a large number of them have slipped through the cracks. I’d like to help bring them back. 
READ MORE »

The Elusive Kitten: How To Spot A Peckham (Deacon Robert Peckham)

By
Image
In which a cat is very hard to find, because art imitates life. It may not come as a surprise that my recent interest in the works of folk portraitist Deacon Robert Peckham has led me to compile a full catalog of known and unknown Peckhams. After all, when one discovers a new favorite artist, it’s a natural instinct to gather together all of their works, arrange them in proper detailed order, and then go find some more. Fortunately, the job’s much easier when the artist is consistent. So far, during the Peckham-scavenging process, I’ve spotted about a half-dozen of them. They’re usually not too difficult to track down. However (at risk of sounding like the Wicked Witch of the West) this little girl and her little cat escaped me for months. 
READ MORE »

Meet the Gages (Deacon Robert Peckham)

By
Image
From a typo to a temporary loss of identity. A large part of my folk art research method involves scrolling through thousands of records of American School sales, looking at countless pictures to match patterns and spot similarities. There’s a method to the madness, even though most of the time, it is just madness. But when something leaps out, it makes it all worthwhile. One example of the illogical soundness of the brute-force search is Frances and Humphrey Cousens — Peckham’s last two paintings, as listed in Deborah Chotner's Hobby Horse catalog (p. 43), aka the Peckham bible. 
READ MORE »

Eminently Artful? (Deacon Robert Peckham)

By
Image
The art of resemblance is a tricky one. People don’t like being committed to memory in an unflattering likeness (just ask any photographer). Historically, artists often chose to enhance a person’s appearance, smoothing out any blemishes and modifying their features for the better. Most frequently, portraits aspired towards whatever the contemporary ideal of conventional beauty happened to be, which varied widely over time and culture. However, the underlying principle is the same: Don’t make them look bad.
READ MORE »

The Haunted Nephew (Deacon Robert Peckham)

By
Image
In which a terrifying little boy goes missing, but winds up immortalized in a classic horror movie. The process of compiling an artist’s works is never easy. Especially in folk art, unsigned pieces are often scattered far and wide, identified only by stylistic quirks and a tenuous chain of linked names and family connections. So, for the sake of thoroughness, whenever I’m tracking down an artist, I scrounge around as many sites as I can get my hands on. You never know what might turn up.
READ MORE »